Archive for April, 2008

No Country For Old Men – Analysis *SPOILERS*

Apr 13, 2008 in american film, analysis, film reviews

    I re-watched No Country For Old Men, making tonight my second viewing of the film.  I have to say, it is a lot better when you “get it.”  There certainly is a significant message behind this film and one’s appreciation of it can be greatly increased by a deeper reading.  Here are some of my notes.  Of course, this is just my personal reading of the film, and only parts that I can remember on the fly.

*** SPOILERS ***

First of all, the story is excellent, superficially.  The suspense aspect of the film should not be ignored as a means of entertainment.
There are several characters who are supernatural (non-human):
- Anton Chigurh is the ‘angel of death,’ or the reaper.  Anyone who sees him, well.. it is their time to die.  (Accountant: “Are you going to shoot me?” Anton:”That depends… do you see me?”)  There is once chance to live though… call the coin correctly.  I think this may just be the random chance of life/death.   Anton is obviously sent from hell… notice his smile when he is told to “go to hell.”  Notice, too, at the end where he tells the kids that they “never saw him.”
- The sheriffs are ‘angels’ (of life) or guardian angels.  They watch over their cities.  Notice the hats are rounded to symbolize their ‘hallows.’  They are seen with lit backgrounds around their heads (as did Anton).  Some angels are still in training, and others are retired.  How old one is depends on how much evil they have seen.  Thus, why Sheriff Bell (Tommy Lee Jones) is older than his dad in his dream.
- Everybody else are normal people.  Though some people are various deals in place with the angel of death… but obviously they all die.  The only person who lives from Anton is the gas station owner.  Carla Jean, and the accountant died.
- The cause of all their deaths are from greed.  Money is not just the literal cause (from the story), but also metaphorically the death from the introduction of wealth in society.  You can get this from the talks by Sheriff Bell.
- No one knows when death will come, and they are never ready for it.  Listen to the final conversation between Carla Jean and Anton.  It is always coming for you, and there is no escape.  Llewellyn made a ‘deal with the devil’ by not supplying the Mexican int he truck with water, which is a life source.  Instead he will take the money.  We see his conscious play out when he wakes up in the night to take the water to him.  But the deal has already been made.  Also notice how the Sheriff describes the way that when steer are slaughtered via the air gun, they are “dead before they knew what hit them.”  Thus, Anton’s use of the air gun is fitting.
- The entire story is not about Llewelyn and his greed of money.  This is a subplot.  The story is actually about Sheriff Bell, who becomes an angel long ago, as he describes at the beginning of the story, but now is going to see his final episode of greed and humanity that makes him quit as an ‘angel’ and move on to death/the afterlife.  It goes without saying that the dream Sheriff Bell recites at the end of the film is actually his proceeding to the afterlife and quitting of being a “sheriff.”  Thus it is fitting that the film ends here.

In light of all this… I my rating for this film is:

Rating – 5 /5

Post to Twitter

Is (cable) TV really necessary?

Apr 12, 2008 in blog, TV

    For the last couple days, I’ve been pondering about whether I should give up one of my interests.  This stems from the realization that I’ve been ignoring some things in my life which are more important to me in order to do others which I think I could easily give up.  One of them which I probably could give up is TV.

There are three main reasons why I watch TV.  For normal broadcast shows, for movies on IFC and the sundance channel, and for sports.  I could probably get by just fine without the broadcast shows, since I would be able to pick them up via antenna, still in HDTV.  I would have to give up a few things, but all-in-all I wouldn’t be too hard off there.  The money savings from not having cable would negate the loss of good asian film on the sundance channel, since I could buy the DVDs instead (and have much better sound/picture quality anyways).  Sports would be the biggest hit.  Because I love to watch things like college football on Saturdays on ESPN, late at night.  And when Maria Sharapova is playing in a Grand Slam, it is usually on ESPN2 HD.  That said… I wouldn’t be surprised if I could get some kind of subscription to watch them via the internet.

So where does this put me?  Well.. I don’t really know if getting rid of TV would give me that much more time to do other things.  I don’t spend too much time on TV as it is.  I suppose just not wasting time by lounging around the house and surfing the net all day would yield more to doing the things that I really want to do to improve my life.  Also, saving that $15 or so per month by combining internet and TV would be lost… and the internet is something that I can not give up for many reasons.

Post to Twitter